An atomic clock that uses an aluminum atom to apply the logic of computers to the peculiarities of the quantum world now rivals the world's most accurate clock, based on a single mercury atom. Both clocks are at least 10 times more accurate than the current US time standard. The measurements were made in a yearlong comparison of the two next-generation clocks, both designed and built at the Commerce Department's National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). The clocks were compared with record precision, allowing scientists to measure their relative frequencies to 17 digits -- the most accurate measurement of this type ever made. The comparison produced the most precise results yet in the worldwide quest to determine whether some of the fundamental constants that describe the universe are changing slightly over time, a hot research question that may alter basic models of the cosmos, the NIST said in a statement. The aluminum and mercury clocks are both based on natural vibrations in ions (electrically charged atoms) and would neither gain nor lose one second in over 1 billion years -- if they could run for such a long time -- compared to about 80 million years for NIST-F1, the US time standard based on neutral cesium atoms.Screenshot from animation of NIST logic clock (Image: Greg Kuebler/JILA). Download animation (378 MB .mov file, QuickTime player required.) The mercury clock was first demonstrated in 2000 and is now four times better than its last published evaluation in 2006, thanks to ongoing improvements in the clock design and operation. It continues its reign as the world’s most accurate clock by a margin of 20 percent over the aluminum one, but the designers say both experimental clocks could be improved further. “The aluminum clock is very accurate because it is insensitive to background magnetic and electric fields, and also to temperature,” said Till Rosenband, the NIST physicist who built the clock and is the lead author of a paper on the research (Science Express, March 6). “It has the lowest known sensitivity of any atomic clock to temperature, which is one of the most difficult uncertainties to calibrate.” Both the aluminum and the mercury clocks are based on ions vibrating at optical frequencies, which are 100,000 times higher than microwave frequencies used in NIST-F1 and other similar time standards around the world. Because optical clocks divide time into smaller units, they can be far more precise than microwave standards. NIST scientists have several other optical atomic clocks in development, including one based on thousands of neutral strontium atoms. The strontium clock recently achieved twice the accuracy of NIST-F1, but it still trails the mercury and aluminum clocks, the NIST said. NIST physicist Till Rosenband adjusts the quantum logic clock, which derives its “ticks” from the natural vibrations of an aluminum ion (electrically charged atom). The aluminum ion is trapped together with one beryllium ion inside the copper-colored chamber in the foreground. (Photo courtesy NIST; copyright © Geoffrey Wheeler) Highly accurate clocks are used to synchronize telecommunications networks and deep-space communications, and for satellite navigation and positioning. Next-generation clocks may also lead to new types of gravity sensors, which have potential applications in exploration for underground natural resources and fundamental studies of the Earth. Laboratories around the world are developing optical clocks based on a variety of different designs and atoms; the NIST said it is not yet clear which design will emerge as the best candidate for the next international standard. The paper provides the first published evaluation of the operational quantum logic clock, so-named because it is based on the logical reasoning process used in quantum computers, the NIST said in a statement. The clock is a spinoff of NIST research on quantum computers, which grew out of earlier atomic clock research. Quantum computers, if they can be built, will be capable of solving certain types of complex problems that are impossible or prohibitively costly or time consuming to solve with today’s technologies. The NIST quantum logic clock uses two different kinds of ions, aluminum and beryllium, confined closely together in an electromagnetic trap and slowed by lasers to nearly “absolute zero” temperatures. Aluminum is a stable source of clock ticks, but its properties cannot be detected easily with lasers. The NIST scientists applied quantum computing methods to share information from the aluminum ion with the beryllium ion, a workhorse of their quantum computing research. The scientists can detect the aluminum clock’s ticks by observing light signals from the beryllium ion. NIST’s tandem ion approach is unique among the world’s atomic clocks and has a key advantage: “You can pick from a bigger selection of atoms,” said NIST physicist Jim Bergquist, who built the mercury clock. “And aluminum has a lot of good qualities -- better than mercury’s.” An optical clock can be evaluated precisely only by comparison to another clock of similar accuracy serving as a “ruler.” NIST scientists used the quantum logic clock to measure the mercury clock, and vice versa. In addition, based on fluctuations in the frequencies of the two clocks relative to each other over time, NIST scientists were able to search for a possible change over time in a fundamental quantity called the fine-structure constant. This quantity measures the strength of electromagnetic interactions in many areas of physics, from studies of atoms and molecules to astronomy."Some evidence from astronomy has suggested the fine-structure constant may be changing very slowly over billions of years," the NIST said." If such changes are real, scientists would have to dramatically change their theories of the fundamental nature of the universe." The NIST measurements indicate that the value of the fine-structure constant is not changing by more than 1.6 quadrillionths of 1 percent per year, with an uncertainty of 2.3 quadrillionths of 1 percent per year (a quadrillionth is a millionth of a billionth). The result is small enough to be “consistent with no change,” according to the paper. However, it is still possible that the fine-structure constant is changing at a rate smaller than anyone can yet detect. The new NIST limit is approximately 10 times smaller than the best previous measurement of the possible present-day rate of change in the fine-structure constant. The mercury clock is an especially useful tool for such tests, because its frequency fluctuations are magnified by any changes in this constant, according to the NIST. The work described in the paper was supported in part by the Office of Naval Research and Disruptive Technology Office. For more information, visit: nist.gov