Nichia's antitrust claim points to events leading up to and culminating in several agreements between Rohm and Cree. In particular, the antitrust claim asserts that Rohm fabricated a domestic industry to obtain ITC jurisdiction by entering a license agreement with Cree in December 2000, three days before Rohm filed its ITC complaint against Nichia.
The antitrust claim allows Nichia to pursue discovery that Nichia believes Rohm attempted to avoid with its abrupt ITC complaint withdrawal in April 2001. Rohm withdrew its ITC complaint seven days after the ITC judge ordered discovery on antitrust issues and shortly before Rohm was required to submit related documents. The US District Court action also allows Nichia to pursue monetary damages and injunctive relief against Rohm and Cree.